Aug 5, 2013

Asking the right questions

Last month two Zambian online publications most critical of the government were victims of targeted attacks which made them inaccessible to users within the country. This set off a cat and mouse game between one of the publications and those said to behind the attack. Multiple proxies were put in place to circumvent the blocks. It’s still ongoing.

From the outset the general consensus has been that the government is behind the blocking though officials have neither confirmed nor denied the allegations. In recent months our Vice-President and other cabinet members have categorically stated that they would be cheered if the publications were effectively killed off due to the negative reporting of the government. So, it’s not a leap for people to accuse the government of carrying out those threats.

Much of the outcry has been about censorship. Yet there’s an issue that very few people are talking about – the legal framework. If indeed the government is behind the blocking of online publications what legal framework have they used? Is there a signed court order that gave them green light for the action? If so, what case was built to convince a judge that taking down the sites was justifiable?

These are very important questions to ask because the answers are telling of our government’s rationale and respect for the law. There is an assumption that this action is simply targeted at clamping down on publications who don’t conform to the government’s will. This may be true, but I really think we ought to asking about due process. Was it followed? If it was, then the government shouldn’t have a problem sharing this information and deflecting some of the criticism. If not, then we have an even bigger problem on our hands.


Irrespective of receiving daily oral or future injectable depot therapies, these require health care visits for medication and monitoring of safety and response. If patients are treated early enough, before a lot of immune system damage has occurred, life expectancy is close to normal, as long as they remain on successful treatment. However, when patients stop therapy, virus rebounds to high levels in most patients, sometimes associated with severe illness because i have gone through this and even an increased risk of death. The aim of “cure”is ongoing but i still do believe my government made millions of ARV drugs instead of finding a cure. for ongoing therapy and monitoring. ARV alone cannot cure HIV as among the cells that are infected are very long-living CD4 memory cells and possibly other cells that act as long-term reservoirs. HIV can hide in these cells without being detected by the body’s immune system. Therefore even when ART completely blocks subsequent rounds of infection of cells, reservoirs that have been infected before therapy initiation persist and from these reservoirs HIV rebounds if therapy is stopped. “Cure” could either mean an eradication cure, which means to completely rid the body of reservoir virus or a functional HIV cure, where HIV may remain in reservoir cells but rebound to high levels is prevented after therapy interruption.Dr Itua Herbal Medicine makes me believes there is a hope for people suffering from,Cancer,Hiv_ Aids,Herpes,Copd,Diabetes,Hepatitis,I read about him online how he cure Tasha and Tara so i contacted him on even talked on whatsapps +2348149277967 believe me it was easy i drank his herbal medicine for two weeks and i was cured just like that isn't Dr Itua a wonder man? Yes he is! I thank him so much so i will advise if you are suffering from one of those diseases Pls do contact him he's a nice man.

Post a Comment